Sources Everything asserted on this site, and where it comes from.

I. Published work on the codex

• Tokai, Gábor and Király, Levente Zoltán. Cracking the code of the Rohonc Codex. Cryptologia 42(4), 2018.
• Király, Levente Zoltán. Work on sentence segmentation, the table of contents and the chapter system, 2011.
• Tokai, Gábor. Three articles in Élet és Tudomány, 2010 to 2011, on dating the imagery and on the evangelist and year codes.
• Láng, Benedek. Survey and monograph, 2010 onward, arguing for an encoded rather than fabricated text.
• Singh, Mahesh Kumar. Brahmi and Hindi reading, 2004, published with its refutation in the same issue.
• Enăchiuc, Viorica. Rohonczi Codex, 2002. Dacian vulgar Latin reading.
• Nyíri, Attila. Sumero-Hungarian reading, 1996.
• Locsmándi, Miklós. Computer-assisted structural study, mid 1990s.
• Gyürk, Ottó. Structural study of repeated sequences and reading order, 1970.
• Némäti, Kálmán. Rohonczi Codex Tantétel, 1892, and the sign count of 1889 onward.
• Szabó, Károly, 1866, for the attribution to Sámuel Literáti Nemes.
• Jerney, János. Tudománytár, 1844.

II. The manuscript and its images

• Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, manuscript K 114. Microfilm MF 1173/II. Consultation of the original requires permission.
• University of Hamburg, higher-resolution photography of eight pages, 2015.
• Internet Archive, RohonciCodexK114cs, 227 page scans, CC0. The plates on this site are from that set, reproduced as scanned.

III. Our own measurements

The figures on the evidence page come from two probes run over the 227 public scans in July 2026: connected-component sizing and row detection, both after local-mean binarisation. They are ours and may be reproduced with attribution. They describe the scans and not the manuscript.

Corrections are welcome and will be made. If you hold a transcription, or better images, that is the thing this site most wants to hear about.